Rose v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Rose v. State

822 S.W.2d 850, 308 Ark. 535, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 125

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 2, 1992

DocketCR 92-190

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 822 S.W.2d 850 (Rose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. State, 822 S.W.2d 850, 308 Ark. 535, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 125 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Dossie Rose, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Clarke Arnold, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Related Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Dossie Rose, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Clarke Arnold, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Related Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

822 S.W.2d 850, 308 Ark. 535, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-state-ark-1992.