Rose v. Garfield Hts.

112 Ohio St. 3d 1446
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 2007·No. 2005-1828·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 85420 and 85426, 2005-0hio-4165. Reported at 111 Ohio St.3d 1209, 2006-Ohio-5698, 855 N.E.2d 1233. On motions for reconsideration of Clarendon National Insurance Company and Ronald and Nikld Rose. Motions denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Garfield Hts., 112 Ohio St. 3d 1446 (Ohio 2007).

112 Ohio St. 3d 1446 (Rose v. Garfield Hts.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. West, Unpublished Decision (10-27-2006)
2006 Ohio 5698 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Rose v. City of Garfield Heights
855 N.E.2d 1233 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)