Rose v. Garfield Hts.

112 Ohio St. 3d 1446
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 24, 2007
Docket2005-1828
StatusPublished

This text of 112 Ohio St. 3d 1446 (Rose v. Garfield Hts.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Garfield Hts., 112 Ohio St. 3d 1446 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 85420 and 85426, 2005-0hio-4165. Reported at 111 Ohio St.3d 1209, 2006-Ohio-5698, 855 N.E.2d 1233. On motions for reconsideration of Clarendon National Insurance Company and Ronald and Nikld Rose. Motions denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. West, Unpublished Decision (10-27-2006)
2006 Ohio 5698 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Rose v. City of Garfield Heights
855 N.E.2d 1233 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 Ohio St. 3d 1446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-garfield-hts-ohio-2007.