Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Rose v. City of Garfield Heights

Rose v. City of Garfield Heights

855 N.E.2d 1233, 111 Ohio St. 3d 1209
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 2006
DocketNo. 2005-1828
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 855 N.E.2d 1233 (Rose v. City of Garfield Heights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. City of Garfield Heights, 855 N.E.2d 1233, 111 Ohio St. 3d 1209 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 2} The court orders that the opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Moyer, C.J., Boggins, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. John F. Boggins, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rose v. Garfield Hts.
112 Ohio St. 3d 1446 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
855 N.E.2d 1233, 111 Ohio St. 3d 1209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-city-of-garfield-heights-ohio-2006.