Rose v. Clinton
557 So. 2d 614, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 799, 1990 WL 11810
This text of 557 So. 2d 614 (Rose v. Clinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rose v. Clinton, 557 So. 2d 614, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 799, 1990 WL 11810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
The interim order determining James J. Clinton, III, to be a shareholder in Consolidated Dyeing, Inc., and entitled to an accounting is not a final judgment, Fla.R. App.P. 9.030(b)(1)(A), or an appealable non-final order, Peters v. Menendez, 491 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Dauer v. Freed, 444 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dauer v. Freed
444 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Peters v. Menendez
491 So. 2d 1300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
557 So. 2d 614, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 799, 1990 WL 11810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-clinton-fladistctapp-1990.