Peters v. Menendez

491 So. 2d 1300, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1692, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9218
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1986·No. No. 86-630·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order entered in favor of the plaintiff Manuel J. Menen-dez on the issue of liability only in an action and counteraction for specific performance and other relief, after a trial thereon, with the issue of damages to be heard at a subsequent trial. We dismiss this appeal upon a holding that (a) the order under review is not a final judgment and is therefore not appealable to this court as a final judgment under Article V, Section 4(b)(1), Florida Constitution, and (b) the order under review is not an appealable non-final order under Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), and is therefore not ap-pealable to this court under Article V, Section 4(b)(1), Florida Constitution, based on the controlling and indistinguishable authority of Dauer v. Freed, 444 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters v. Menendez, 491 So. 2d 1300, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1692, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

491 So. 2d 1300 (Peters v. Menendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rose v. Clinton
557 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)