Rose v. City of Rocky Mount
This text of 644 S.E.2d 232 (Rose v. City of Rocky Mount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sandra ROSE, Employee, Plaintiff
v.
CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, Self-Insured Employer, Compensation Claims Solutions, Administrator, Defendants.
Supreme Court of North Carolina. Tenth District.
Matthew P. Blake, Ginny P. Lanier, Cary, for City of Rocky Mount.
Paul N. Blake, Wilson, Albert S. Thomas, Jr., for Rose.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of January 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
644 S.E.2d 232, 2007 WL 1063580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-city-of-rocky-mount-nc-2007.