Rose v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 26, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-01979·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11

12 ROBERT ROSE and PAUL SIMI, on No. 2:23-cv-01979 WBS AC behalf of themselves and 13 those similarly situated, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC, and DOES 1 17 through 50, 18 Defendants. 19 20 ----oo0oo---- 21 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER 22 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the 23 court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 24 scheduled for July 1, 2024, and makes the following findings and 25 orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. 26 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 27 All defendants have been served, and no further service 28 is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown 1 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 2 II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS 3 No further joinder of parties or amendments to 4 pleadings will be permitted except with leave of court, good 5 cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 16(b). See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 7 (9th Cir. 1992). 8 III. JURISDICTION/VENUE 9 The court has federal question jurisdiction in this 10 putative labor class action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, because 11 several of plaintiffs’ claims are completely preempted by the 12 Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. See Balcorta v. 13 Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 208 F.3d 1102, 1107 (9th Cir. 14 2000). Venue is undisputed and hereby found to be proper. 15 IV. DISCOVERY1 16 The parties represent that they served the initial 17 disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) 18 on April 15, 2024. 19 The parties shall disclose experts and produce reports 20 in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no 21

22 1 The parties requested that the court set a deadline for discovery on the named plaintiffs’ individual claims with a 23 further status conference to be held following that discovery to set the remaining dates and deadlines. The court declines to do 24 so, as it concludes that bifurcating class discovery without good reason and delaying the establishment of the case schedule would 25 not be conducive to the efficient administration of justice in this case. 26 Because the parties have failed to comply with Local 27 Rule 240 in violation of this court’s order (see Docket No. 8), the court will select all dates and deadlines without further 28 input from the parties. 1 later than September 26, 2025. With regard to expert testimony 2 intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed 3 and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil 4 Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before October 24, 2025. 5 All discovery, including depositions for preservation 6 of testimony, is left open, save and except that it shall be so 7 conducted as to be completed by November 21, 2025. The word 8 “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so 9 that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to 10 discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if 11 necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has 12 been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on 13 the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local 14 rules of this court and so that such motions may be heard (and 15 any resulting orders obeyed) not later than November 21, 2025. 16 V. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE 17 All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary 18 restraining orders, or other emergency applications, shall be 19 filed on or before January 30, 2026. All motions shall be 20 noticed for the next available hearing date. Counsel are 21 cautioned to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements 22 for noticing and opposing such motions on the court’s regularly 23 scheduled law and motion calendar. 24 VI. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 25 The Final Pretrial Conference is set for April 20, 26 2026, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom No. 5. The conference shall be 27 attended by at least one of the attorneys who will conduct the 28 trial for each of the parties and by any unrepresented parties. 1 Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for 2 trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no matters 3 remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for 4 oral testimony. Counsel shall file separate pretrial statements, 5 and are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the 6 contents of and time for filing those statements. In addition to 7 those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to 8 provide the court with: (1) a plain, concise statement which 9 identifies every non-discovery motion which has been made to the 10 court, and its resolution; (2) a list of the remaining claims as 11 against each defendant; and (3) the estimated number of trial 12 days. 13 In providing the plain, concise statements of 14 undisputed facts and disputed factual issues contemplated by 15 Local Rule 281(b)(3)-(4), the parties shall emphasize the claims 16 that remain at issue, and any remaining affirmatively pled 17 defenses thereto. If the case is to be tried to a jury, the 18 parties shall also prepare a succinct statement of the case, 19 which is appropriate for the court to read to the jury. 20 VII. TRIAL SETTING 21 The jury trial is set for June 16, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. 22 The parties have not provided an estimate of the length of trial. 23 VIII. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 24 A Settlement Conference with a magistrate judge will be 25 set at the time of the Pretrial Conference. Counsel are 26 instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority 27 present at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to 28 settle the matter on any terms. At least seven calendar days eee mI RO IIE EIR IRE ISI EN IE IEE IED OE

1 before the Settlement Conference counsel for each party shall 2 submit a confidential Settlement Conference Statement for review 3 by the settlement judge. The Settlement Conference Statements 4 shall not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed to the 5 trial judge. 6 IX. MODIFICATIONS TO SCHEDULING ORDER 7 Any requests to modify the dates or terms of this 8 Scheduling Order, except requests to change the date of the 9 trial, may be heard and decided by the assigned Magistrate Judge. 10 All requests to change the trial date shall be heard and decided 11 only by the undersigned judge. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: June 25, 2024 □ - ak. M4 WILLIAMB.SHUBB ==~=~S 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Rose v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC (Rose v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Balcorta v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
208 F.3d 1102 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)