Roscoe Jones v. City of Opelika. Lois Bowden and Zada Sanders v. City of Fort Smith, Arkansas. Charles Jobin v. The State of Arizona

319 U.S. 103, 63 S. Ct. 890
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 3, 1943
DocketNos. 280, 314, 966
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 319 U.S. 103 (Roscoe Jones v. City of Opelika. Lois Bowden and Zada Sanders v. City of Fort Smith, Arkansas. Charles Jobin v. The State of Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roscoe Jones v. City of Opelika. Lois Bowden and Zada Sanders v. City of Fort Smith, Arkansas. Charles Jobin v. The State of Arizona, 319 U.S. 103, 63 S. Ct. 890 (1943).

Opinion

319 U.S. 103

63 S.Ct. 890

87 L.Ed. 1290

Roscoe JONES, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF OPELIKA. Lois BOWDEN and Zada Sanders, Petitioners, v. CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS. Charles JOBIN, Appellant, v. The STATE OF ARIZONA.

Nos. 280, 314, 966.

Reargued March 10, 11, 1943.

Decided May 3, 1943.

Robert MURDOCK, Jr., Petitioner,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE), and

seven other cases.

Nos. 280, 314, 966, 480—487.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 3, 1943

Mr. Justice REED, dissenting.

Mr. Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.

No appearance for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U.S. 584, 62 S.Ct. 1231, 86 L.Ed. 1691, 141 A.L.R. 514. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Nos. 480-487, Murdock et al. v. Pennsylvania. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in Nos. 480-487, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 870, 87 L.Ed. —-, decided this day, and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. So ordered.

Reversed.

For dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice REED, and Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, see 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 891.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Youth Careers, Inc. v. CITY OF AMES, IA
412 F. Supp. 2d 994 (S.D. Iowa, 2006)
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue
314 N.W.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)
Fernandes v. Limmer
663 F.2d 619 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Arnold E. Strasser v. Joseph A. Doorley, Jr.
432 F.2d 567 (First Circuit, 1970)
Long v. City of Anaheim
255 Cal. App. 2d 191 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
180 So. 2d 114 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)
Braunfeld v. Brown
366 U.S. 599 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Magtab Publishing Corp. v. Howard
169 F. Supp. 65 (W.D. Louisiana, 1959)
MAGTAB PUBLISHING CORPORATION v. Howard
169 F. Supp. 65 (W.D. Louisiana, 1959)
City of Corona v. Corona Daily Independent
252 P.2d 56 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
Smith v. Lemme
75 Pa. D. & C. 275 (Crawford County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Bailey v. Richardson
182 F.2d 46 (D.C. Circuit, 1950)
Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. Clark
177 F.2d 79 (D.C. Circuit, 1949)
Application of Wiebe
82 F. Supp. 130 (D. Nebraska, 1949)
Barsky v. United States
167 F.2d 241 (D.C. Circuit, 1948)
Brown v. City of Stillwater
1944 OK CR 45 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1944)
Busey v. District of Columbia
138 F.2d 592 (D.C. Circuit, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 U.S. 103, 63 S. Ct. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roscoe-jones-v-city-of-opelika-lois-bowden-and-zada-sanders-v-city-of-scotus-1943.