Roscoe E. Reams v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

428 F.2d 1225, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8412
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 1970
Docket19955_1
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 428 F.2d 1225 (Roscoe E. Reams v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roscoe E. Reams v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 428 F.2d 1225, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8412 (8th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roscoe E. Reams, by complaint filed in the United States district court, sought to overturn a final adjudication by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying him Social Security disability benefits under 42 U.S.C. §§ 416 (i), 423. Judge McManus dismissed the complaint, and Reams filed this appeal.

We consider the same issue that Reams submitted to the district court; whether substantial evidence supports the Secretary’s finding of fact that Reams’ dis *1226 ability produced by pulmonary emphysema did not prevent him from “engaging in substantial gainful activity”.

Reams’ emphysematous condition became manifest during late 1965. On December 7, 1966, his employer of twenty-seven years standing, Rath Packing Company of Waterloo, Iowa, terminated Reams’ employment on account of this affliction. During the summer of 1967, however, the Minneapolis Rehabilitation Center, in a week-long study, evaluated Reams’ employment skills in the light of his physical condition and found him capable and physically qualified to return to his former job as a foreman or of performing light factory work. The medical testimony concerning the disabling effect of Reams’ disease is in conflict.

Upon trial of the ease, Judge McManus found substantial evidence to support the administrative determination of the Secretary. Reams v. Finch, 313 F.Supp. 1272 (N.D.Iowa 1970).

We agree and affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conard v. Bowen
710 F. Supp. 251 (S.D. Iowa, 1988)
Bocian v. Mathews
411 F. Supp. 1200 (N.D. Iowa, 1976)
Rufer v. Richardson
345 F. Supp. 583 (D. South Dakota, 1972)
Bebout v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
348 F. Supp. 227 (W.D. Missouri, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
428 F.2d 1225, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roscoe-e-reams-v-robert-h-finch-secretary-of-health-education-and-ca8-1970.