Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2006·No. 05-7686·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7686

JESUS EDUARDO ROSAS-ZULOAGA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-425-5)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesus Eduardo Rosas-Zuloaga, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jesus Eduardo Rosas-Zuloaga, a federal prisoner, appeals

the district court’s dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

ground that Zuloaga’s petition is properly charaterized as an

unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

* To the extent Rosas-Zuloaga may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second and successive § 2255 motion based on the rules announced in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), we deny authorization.

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States, (4th Cir. 2006).

Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States (Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)