Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 2006
Docket05-7686
StatusUnpublished

This text of Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States (Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7686

JESUS EDUARDO ROSAS-ZULOAGA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-425-5)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesus Eduardo Rosas-Zuloaga, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jesus Eduardo Rosas-Zuloaga, a federal prisoner, appeals

the district court’s dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

ground that Zuloaga’s petition is properly charaterized as an

unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

* To the extent Rosas-Zuloaga may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second and successive § 2255 motion based on the rules announced in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), we deny authorization.

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosas-Zuloaga v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosas-zuloaga-v-united-states-ca4-2006.