Rosado v. Wyman
This text of 395 U.S. 826 (Rosado v. Wyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motions of Joseph Barbaro et al. and American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae are granted. The motion to expedite review is denied.
The application to vacate the stays granted by the *827 Court of Appeals on June 11, 1969, and June 19, 1969, of the injunctions of the District Court, presented to Me. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, is denied.
The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 1539 is denied. The appeal in No. 1540 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission, 393 U. S. 83 (1968); Wilson v. Port Lavaca, 391 U. S. 352 (1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
395 U.S. 826, 89 S. Ct. 2134, 23 L. Ed. 2d 739, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosado-v-wyman-scotus-1969.