Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

832 A.2d 72, 266 Conn. 907, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 399
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 18, 2003·No. SC 17059·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the Hartford Courant Company for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014/AC 23015/AC 23016/AC 23017/AC 23069/AC 23078/AC 23079/AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Ralph G. Elliot, in support of the petition. John B. Farley, Joseph T. Sweeney, Ralph W. Johnson III, James V. Somers, James F. Stapleton, John F. Conway and W. Glen Pierson, in opposition. Decided September 18, 2003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 832 A.2d 72, 266 Conn. 907, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 399 (Colo. 2003).

832 A.2d 72 (Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ingels v. Saldana
930 A.2d 774 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)
Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino
290 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D. Connecticut, 2003)