Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

832 A.2d 71, 266 Conn. 906, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 398
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 18, 2003
DocketSC 17060
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 832 A.2d 71 (Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 832 A.2d 71, 266 Conn. 906, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 398 (Colo. 2003).

Opinion

The petition for certification by the New York Times Company, Globe Newspaper Company, Inc., and the Washington Post Company for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014/AC 23015/AC 23016/AC 23017/AC 23069/AC 23078/AC 23079/AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?”
[907]*907The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17060. James S. Rollins and Kimberly M. White, in support of the petition. John B. Farley, Joseph T. Sweeney, Ralph W. Johnson III, James V. Somers, James F. Stapleton, John F. Conway and W. Glen Pierson, in opposition. Decided September 18, 2003

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
884 A.2d 981 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
832 A.2d 71, 266 Conn. 906, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosado-v-bridgeport-roman-catholic-diocesan-corp-conn-2003.