Ronjee Middleton v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 1, 2014
Docket04-14-00678-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ronjee Middleton v. State (Ronjee Middleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronjee Middleton v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 1, 2014

No. 04-14-00678-CR

Ronjee MIDDLETON, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR0666 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a motion to unseal Defendant’s Exhibit 1, the juror information sheets. Appellant contends he intends to argue on appeal that Batson v. Kentucky extends to jury shuffles, and he needs the information in the sealed exhibit “in order for him to make a full argument of the issue.”

Article 35.29 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that information collected by the trial court or the State during the jury selection process about a person who serves as a juror may not be disclosed by the trial court, the State, the defense, or any court personnel. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 35.29(a). However, the article provides that upon application by a party in the court, the information may be disclosed upon a showing of good cause. Id. art. 35.29(b). The court to which an application must be made is the trial court. Falcon v. State, 879 S.W.2d 249, 250 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no pet.). If the trial court refuses the request, the applicant may challenge the ruling by mandamus. Id.

Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal abated and all appellate deadlines stayed. We ORDER the matter remanded to the trial court for a hearing pursuant to Article 35.29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We further ORDER that after the hearing, the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law on the issues relevant to the unsealing of the document in question, specifically as to the existence or absence of good cause. The hearing shall be held within thirty days of the date of this order, and the trial court’s findings and conclusions shall be completed within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. We ORDER the trial court clerk to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and file it in this court on or before January 30, 2015. We also ORDER the court reporter to report the hearing and to file a reporter’s record from the hearing in this court on or before January 30, 2015. We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court, the district clerk, the court reporter, and all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of December, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Falcon v. State
879 S.W.2d 249 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ronjee Middleton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronjee-middleton-v-state-texapp-2014.