Falcon v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Falcon v. State

879 S.W.2d 249, 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1318, 1994 WL 233846

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 27, 1994

DocketNo. 01-93-00915-CR

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 879 S.W.2d 249 (Falcon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falcon v. State, 879 S.W.2d 249, 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1318, 1994 WL 233846 (Tex. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of attempted capital murder and attempted aggravated robbery. The jury list and juror information forms were sealed upon order of the trial court. Appellant seeks to have the jury list and juror information forms included in the transcript “so that counsel for appellant can determine if a Batson¹ issue or other error in jury selection may exist.” In order to have the desired materials included in the transcript, appellant asks us to grant his motion to supplement “and order the supplementation of the transcript ... with the jury list and juror information forms.”

Article 35.29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, entitled “Personal information about jurors,” states:

Information collected by the court or by a prosecuting attorney during the jury selection process about a person who serves as a juror, including the juror’s home address, home telephone number, social security number, driver’s license number, and other personal information, is confidential and may not be disclosed by the court, the prosecuting attorney, the defense counsel, or any court personnel except on application by a party in the trial or on application by a bona fide member of the news media acting in such capacity to the court in which the person is serving or did serve as a juror. On a showing of good cause, the court shall permit disclosure of the information sought.

Tex.Code Crim.P. art. 35.29 (Vernon Supp. 1994). When article 35.29 uses the phrase “the court,” it clearly refers to the trial court in which the trial at issue is pending or has occurred. Appellant, therefore, must present his request to unseal the jury list and juror information forms to the trial court. On a showing of good cause, the trial court shall permit disclosure. Id. If the trial court, after permitting appellant an opportunity to show good cause, refuses disclosure, appellant may challenge the ruling on mandamus.

We should not be the first court to whom appellant complains about the sealing of the jury list and juror information forms. Appellant must first complain, according to article 35.29, to the court that ordered them sealed: the trial court. Accordingly, we overrule appellant’s motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of attempted capital murder and attempted aggravated robbery. The jury list and juror information forms were sealed upon order of the trial court. Appellant seeks to have the jury list and juror information forms included in the transcript “so that counsel for appellant can determine if a Batson¹ issue or other error in jury selection may exist.” In order to have the desired materials included in the transcript, appellant asks us to grant his motion to supplement “and order the supplementation of the transcript ... with the jury list and juror information forms.”

Article 35.29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, entitled “Personal information about jurors,” states:

Information collected by the court or by a prosecuting attorney during the jury selection process about a person who serves as a juror, including the juror’s home address, home telephone number, social security number, driver’s license number, and other personal information, is confidential and may not be disclosed by the court, the prosecuting attorney, the defense counsel, or any court personnel except on application by a party in the trial or on application by a bona fide member of the news media acting in such capacity to the court in which the person is serving or did serve as a juror. On a showing of good cause, the court shall permit disclosure of the information sought.

Tex.Code Crim.P. art. 35.29 (Vernon Supp. 1994). When article 35.29 uses the phrase “the court,” it clearly refers to the trial court in which the trial at issue is pending or has occurred. Appellant, therefore, must present his request to unseal the jury list and juror information forms to the trial court. On a showing of good cause, the trial court shall permit disclosure. Id. If the trial court, after permitting appellant an opportunity to show good cause, refuses disclosure, appellant may challenge the ruling on mandamus.

We should not be the first court to whom appellant complains about the sealing of the jury list and juror information forms. Appellant must first complain, according to article 35.29, to the court that ordered them sealed: the trial court. Accordingly, we overrule appellant’s motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

879 S.W.2d 249, 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1318, 1994 WL 233846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falcon-v-state-texapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack