Ronald Tinsley v. Norman Yatooma
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 24, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
162041 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh
RONALD TINSLEY, VAN BUREN STEEL, Elizabeth M. Welch, INC., and VAN BUREN PROPERTIES OF Justices MICHIGAN, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v SC: 162041 COA: 349354 Wayne CC: 18-011537-NM
NORMAN YATOOMA and NORMAN YATOOMA & ASSOCIATES, PC, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
March 24, 2021
a0317
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ronald Tinsley v. Norman Yatooma (Ronald Tinsley v. Norman Yatooma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.