Ronald Tinsley v. Norman Yatooma
This text of Ronald Tinsley v. Norman Yatooma (Ronald Tinsley v. Norman Yatooma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 10, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano 162041(59) Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh RONALD TINSLEY, VAN BUREN Elizabeth M. Welch, STEEL, INC., and VAN BUREN Justices PROPERTIES OF MICHIGAN, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, SC: 162041 v COA: 349354 Wayne CC: 18-011537-NM NORMAN YATOOMA and NORMAN YATOOMA & ASSOCIATES, PC, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Negligence Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on March 9, 2021, is accepted for filing.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 10, 2021
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald Tinsley v. Norman Yatooma, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-tinsley-v-norman-yatooma-mich-2021.