Ronald Ross v. Williams

Ninth Circuit

Ronald Ross v. Williams

920 F.3d 1222

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 2019

Docket16-16533

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 920 F.3d 1222 (Ronald Ross v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronald Ross v. Williams, 920 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD ROSS, No. 16-16533

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01527-JCM-PAL v. District of Nevada, Las Vegas WILLIAMS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ORDER NEVADA,

Respondents-Appellees.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Miller and Bade did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this

case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI