Ronald Lee Gibson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 10, 2012
DocketA12A2052
StatusPublished

This text of Ronald Lee Gibson v. State (Ronald Lee Gibson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald Lee Gibson v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

FIRST DIVISION ELLINGTON, C. J., PHIPPS, P. J., and DILLARD, J.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/

December 10, 2012

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A12A2052. GIBSON v. THE STATE.

ELLINGTON, Chief Judge.

A Jackson County jury found Ronald Gibson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

of four counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, OCGA § 16-11-131

(b). The trial court sentenced Gibson to five years as to each count, to run

concurrently. The record shows that the four counts pertained to only two firearms.

Specifically, Counts 3 and 5 of the indictment charged Gibson with possessing a

single weapon, a Remington Model 1100 shotgun, on a single day, January 31, 2010.

The two alternative counts were based on two different previous felony convictions.

Similarly, the record shows that Counts 4 and 6 charged Gibson with possessing a

single weapon, an Intrac Arms shotgun, on that same day. Gibson contends that,

because the alternative counts concerned possession of a single weapon on a single day, Count 3 merged with Count 5 and Count 4 merged with Count 6. This is correct,

as the State concedes.

It is axiomatic that an accused may not be convicted of more than one crime

for the same conduct if one crime is included in the other. OCGA § 16-1-7 (a). See

Drinkard v. Walker, 281 Ga. 211, 215 (636 SE2d 530) (2006) (Georgia courts apply

the “required evidence” test to determine whether one crime is included in the other.).

OCGA § 16-11-131 (b) provides that “[a]ny person . . . who has been convicted of a

felony by a court of this state . . . and who . . . possesses . . . any firearm commits a

felony[.]”). Although the State was doubly able to prove Gibson’s status as a

convicted felon, given his two past felony convictions, Counts 3 and 5 both charged

a single offense, that is, one act of being a felon in possession of a Remington Model

1100 shotgun on January 31, 2010. Because Counts 3 and 5 charged a single violation

of Georgia law, the offenses merged and the trial court erred in imposing separate

punishment for each count. See Wyman v. State, 278 Ga. 339, 339-340 (1) (602 SE2d

619) (2004) (Georgia law bars separate punishment for offenses that merge as a

matter of law or fact.); Hawkins v. State, 302 Ga. App. 84, 86 (2) (690 SE2d 440)

(2010) (accord); Warren v. State, 289 Ga. App. 481, 482 (657 SE2d 533) (2008) (A

defendant who had two prior felony convictions and who possessed two guns was

2 guilty of two counts of violating OCGA § 16-11-131(b)). Likewise, Gibson only

committed one act of being a felon in possession of an Intrac Arms shotgun on

January 31, 2010; thus, Counts 4 and 6 merged.

Accordingly, the judgment is vacated, and this case is remanded for

resentencing. Hawkins v. State, 302 Ga. App. 84, 86 (2) (690 SE2d 440) (2010).

Judgment vacated and case remanded. Phipps, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drinkard v. Walker
636 S.E.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)
Wyman v. State
602 S.E.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Warren v. State
657 S.E.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Hawkins v. State
690 S.E.2d 440 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ronald Lee Gibson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-lee-gibson-v-state-gactapp-2012.