Ronald L. Wagner v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Ronald L. Wagner v. United States

403 F.2d 1

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 15, 1968

Docket22383

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 403 F.2d 1 (Ronald L. Wagner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronald L. Wagner v. United States, 403 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant is dissatisfied with his Selective Service classification of 1-A.

With one exception, the painstaking and exhaustive decision of the trial judge, D.C., 292 F.Supp. 1 thoroughly analyzes and correctly decides each of the issues argued on appeal. The exception was not raised in the trial court. For that reason, we could brush it aside and refuse to consider inasmuch as we are not convinced that an injustice has been done appellant. Hansberry v. United States, 295 F.2d 800 (9th Cir. 1961) ; Beadnell v. United States, 303 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1962); Gilbert v. United States, 307 F.2d 322 (9th Cir. 1962) cert. denied 372 U.S. 969, 83 S.Ct. 1095, 10 L.Ed.2d 132 (1963).

Be that as it may, we have thoroughly examined the Selective Service record and find that appellant’s *2 point, first raised in argument, involves a mere clerical error and does not affect the substantial rights of the appellant.

Finding no error, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant is dissatisfied with his Selective Service classification of 1-A.

With one exception, the painstaking and exhaustive decision of the trial judge, D.C., 292 F.Supp. 1 thoroughly analyzes and correctly decides each of the issues argued on appeal. The exception was not raised in the trial court. For that reason, we could brush it aside and refuse to consider inasmuch as we are not convinced that an injustice has been done appellant. Hansberry v. United States, 295 F.2d 800 (9th Cir. 1961) ; Beadnell v. United States, 303 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1962); Gilbert v. United States, 307 F.2d 322 (9th Cir. 1962) cert. denied 372 U.S. 969, 83 S.Ct. 1095, 10 L.Ed.2d 132 (1963).

Be that as it may, we have thoroughly examined the Selective Service record and find that appellant’s *2 point, first raised in argument, involves a mere clerical error and does not affect the substantial rights of the appellant.

Finding no error, we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 F.2d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-l-wagner-v-united-states-ca9-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack