Ronald F. Weiszmann and Deborah C. Weiszmann v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Ninth Circuit

Ronald F. Weiszmann and Deborah C. Weiszmann v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

443 F.2d 29

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 29, 1971·No. 25835·Published·Cited by 107 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed. We approve the Tax Court opinion, Weiszmann v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 52 T.C. 1106.

Taxpayer sought to deduct law school expenses incurred while he was part-time patent clerk and patent trainee of Marathon Oil Company. When he completed his law school work, no patent attorney’s job was open at Marathon. Weiszmann went elsewhere.

In our view, the lack of high probability of or assurance of permanent employment by Marathon militates against the taxpayer.

We reject the equal protection argument made here. He cites the deductibility of teachers’ college expenses (when required to go to school) when they end up as principals. We think that there was a justifiable classification in the instant case. Being a teacher is a sine qua non for a principal’s job (unless you own your own school), while having been a patent trainee is not a prerequisite to being a patent attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed. We approve the Tax Court opinion, Weiszmann v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 52 T.C. 1106.

Taxpayer sought to deduct law school expenses incurred while he was part-time patent clerk and patent trainee of Marathon Oil Company. When he completed his law school work, no patent attorney’s job was open at Marathon. Weiszmann went elsewhere.

In our view, the lack of high probability of or assurance of permanent employment by Marathon militates against the taxpayer.

We reject the equal protection argument made here. He cites the deductibility of teachers’ college expenses (when required to go to school) when they end up as principals. We think that there was a justifiable classification in the instant case. Being a teacher is a sine qua non for a principal’s job (unless you own your own school), while having been a patent trainee is not a prerequisite to being a patent attorney.

Ronald F. Weiszmann and Deborah C. Weiszmann v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 443 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

443 F.2d 29 (Ronald F. Weiszmann and Deborah C. Weiszmann v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related