RONALD EUGENE POU JR., FIRST TRUSTEE JMH FREEDOM TRUST v. ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 7, 2017
DocketA17A0894
StatusPublished

This text of RONALD EUGENE POU JR., FIRST TRUSTEE JMH FREEDOM TRUST v. ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP (RONALD EUGENE POU JR., FIRST TRUSTEE JMH FREEDOM TRUST v. ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
RONALD EUGENE POU JR., FIRST TRUSTEE JMH FREEDOM TRUST v. ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 20, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0894. RONALD EUGENE POU JR., FIRST TRUSTEE JMH FREEDOM TRUST v. ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP et al.

Ronald Eugene Pou Jr., acting pro se, filed a complaint against Aldridge Pite, LLP and at least one other defendant, contesting a foreclosure upon certain real property and setting forth various claims. Aldridge Pite filed a motion to dismiss the action, asserting that Pou’s complaint stated no claim against it upon which relief could be granted. The trial court granted the motion, and Pou filed a notice of appeal giving rise to the instant direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

In cases involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment. See Shoenthal v. Shoenthal, 333 Ga. App. 729, 730 (776 SE2d 663) (2015). In such cases, there must be an express determination under OCGA § 9-11- 54 (b) or there must be compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), and where neither code section is followed, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. See Shoenthal, supra. Here, the trial court’s dismissal order did not dispose of all of Pou’s claims, as the case appears to remain pending below against at least one other defendant, nor did the order direct the entry of judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-54 (b). Therefore, as Pou did not comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as premature.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/20/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shoenthal v. Shoenthal
776 S.E.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
RONALD EUGENE POU JR., FIRST TRUSTEE JMH FREEDOM TRUST v. ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-eugene-pou-jr-first-trustee-jmh-freedom-trust-v-aldridge-pite-gactapp-2017.