Ronald Bradley v. William J. Milliken, Governor of Michigan, and Michigan State Board Ofeducation, Board of Education, City of Detroit, Michigan

519 F.2d 679, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14106
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 1975
Docket75-1668
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 519 F.2d 679 (Ronald Bradley v. William J. Milliken, Governor of Michigan, and Michigan State Board Ofeducation, Board of Education, City of Detroit, Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald Bradley v. William J. Milliken, Governor of Michigan, and Michigan State Board Ofeducation, Board of Education, City of Detroit, Michigan, 519 F.2d 679, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14106 (6th Cir. 1975).

Opinions

ORDER

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan requiring the State defendants to acquire 150 buses to be used in the Detroit desegregation plan to be implemented by the order of the District Court. The case was submitted on briefs and oral arguments this June 11, 1975.

Upon consideration, this court concludes that the District Judge had no choice, under the decision of the Supreme Court in Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974), except to order the immediate acquisition of school buses. No party to the proceeding made any representation to the contrary during the course of the hearing in this court.

Likewise, this court has no choice under the just cited decision of the Supreme Court except to affirm the result of the order of the District Court requiring the acquisition of school buses now, as herein modified. This modification is based upon the representations to this court made by the State defendants and is consistent with the spirit and purposes of the constitutional and statutory provisions and the case law of the State of Michigan as recited in said representations. Said order is modified to read as follows:

Plaintiffs having moved for an order requiring the purchase of transportation equipment, and the court having reviewed the briefs submitted by the parties and having considered the arguments of counsel and being fully advised in the premises:

It is, therefore, ordered, pursuant to Bradley v. Milliken, 484 F.2d 215, 258 (6th Cir. 1973), rev. on other grounds, 418 U.S. 717, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974), that the Order for Acquisi[680]*680tion of Transportation entered by this court on July 11, 1972, be and hereby is reinstated but modified as follows:

1. The Detroit School Board, defendants, shall acquire by purchase, lease or other contractual arrangements 150, 66-passenger yellow school buses meeting the requirements of Michigan Law, to be used in the Detroit Desegregation Plan to be implemented by order of the court. Such purchase, lease or other contractual arrangements shall be consummated no later than July 3, 1975.

2. The State defendants shall bear the costs of this acquisition to the extent of 75% thereof1, and the State defendants .shall take all necessary steps utilizing existing funds already allocated, or to be allocated and by re-allocating existing or new funds, to pay or reimburse the State’s share of such transportation acquisition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 F.2d 679, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-bradley-v-william-j-milliken-governor-of-michigan-and-michigan-ca6-1975.