Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Romo-Jimenez v. State

Romo-Jimenez v. State

114 So. 3d 978, 2012 WL 1752996, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 2012
DocketNo. 5D09-3270
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 978 (Romo-Jimenez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romo-Jimenez v. State, 114 So. 3d 978, 2012 WL 1752996, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juan Javier Romo-Jimenez challenges the denial of his motion to suppress recordings obtained following the approval of a wiretap and the trial court’s sua sponte restriction of the cross-examination of a co-defendant. In addition, Romo-Jimenez raises a Shelton1 issue. Finding no error, we affirm. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition in Adkins.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
802 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (M.D. Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 978, 2012 WL 1752996, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romo-jimenez-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.