Romero v. State

892 So. 2d 564, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1311, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 439
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Romero v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 901 So. 2d 260
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2005·No. Nos. 3D03-1527, 3D03-181·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); Ramirez v. State, 739 So.2d 568 (Fla.1999); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Mitchell v. State, 698 So.2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romero v. State, 892 So. 2d 564, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1311, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

892 So. 2d 564 (Romero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Mitchell v. State
698 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Ramirez v. State
739 So. 2d 568 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)