Romero v. State

892 So. 2d 564, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1311, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 439
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 2005
DocketNos. 3D03-1527, 3D03-181
StatusPublished

This text of 892 So. 2d 564 (Romero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romero v. State, 892 So. 2d 564, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1311, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); Ramirez v. State, 739 So.2d 568 (Fla.1999); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Mitchell v. State, 698 So.2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Mitchell v. State
698 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Ramirez v. State
739 So. 2d 568 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
892 So. 2d 564, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1311, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.