Romero v. State
820 So. 2d 946, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4611, 2002 WL 530148
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3582·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because the defendant’s motion for continuance effected a waiver of his speedy trial rights, see State v. Guzman, 697 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), the application for writ of prohibition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Romero v. State, 820 So. 2d 946, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4611, 2002 WL 530148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
820 So. 2d 946 (Romero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Romero v. State
870 So. 2d 816 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)