Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided July 31, 2008·No. I.C. NO. 552851.·Published

Opinion

* * * * * * * * * * *
Pursuant to Rule 701 of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Rules, plaintiff's grounds for appeal "must be stated with particularity, including the specific errors allegedly committed by the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner." Rule 701. "The penalty for non-compliance with the particularity requirement is waiver of grounds, and, where no grounds are stated, the appeal is abandoned." Wade v.Carolina Brush Mfg. Co., ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 652 S.E.2d 713, 715 (2007); citing Roberts v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 173 N.C. App. 740, 744,619 S.E.2d 907, 910 (2005).

Plaintiff's failure to file or articulate any statement of grounds for her appeal does not constitute a mere failure to strictly comply with Rule 701. Rather, plaintiff's failure constitutes *Page 2 total noncompliance with a fundamental rule of the Industrial Commission. Such noncompliance cannot be waived under Rule 801 and disregards defendants' fundamental right to notice of the grounds for plaintiff's appeal. Wade v. Carolina Brush Mfg. Co., supra.

As such, plaintiff's appeal to the Full Commission is hereby DISMISSED.

This 16th day of July, 2008.

S/___________________

DIANNE C. SELLERS

COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/___________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER

S/___________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2008).

Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy (Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
619 S.E.2d 907 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Wade v. Carolina Brush Manufacturing Co.
652 S.E.2d 713 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)