Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy
This text of Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy (Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff's failure to file or articulate any statement of grounds for her appeal does not constitute a mere failure to strictly comply with Rule 701. Rather, plaintiff's failure constitutes *Page 2 total noncompliance with a fundamental rule of the Industrial Commission. Such noncompliance cannot be waived under Rule 801 and disregards defendants' fundamental right to notice of the grounds for plaintiff's appeal. Wade v. Carolina Brush Mfg. Co., supra.
As such, plaintiff's appeal to the Full Commission is hereby DISMISSED.
This 16th day of July, 2008.
S/___________________
DIANNE C. SELLERS
COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
*Page 1S/___________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
S/___________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-v-cvs-pharmacy-ncworkcompcom-2008.