Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Romeo v. Schmidt

Romeo v. Schmidt

229 A.D.2d 994, 646 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9047
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1996
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D.2d 994 (Romeo v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romeo v. Schmidt, 229 A.D.2d 994, 646 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Cross appeal unanimously dismissed and judgment reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and first cause of action reinstated. Same Memorandum as in Romeo v Schmidt (229 AD2d 992 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hurlbutt, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Romeo v. Schmidt
229 A.D.2d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D.2d 994, 646 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romeo-v-schmidt-nyappdiv-1996.