Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rome v. State

Rome v. State

603 So. 2d 723, 1992 WL 212025
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 1992·No. 91-3106·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

603 So.2d 723 (1992)

Kenneth Anthony ROME, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-3106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 2, 1992.

*724 Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, Nancy L. Showalter, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ERVIN, Judge.

Because the trial court failed to make the requisite findings mandated under Section 775.084(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), when it sentenced appellant as a habitual felony offender, appellant's sentences must be reversed and the case remanded for resentencing. Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rome v. State, 603 So. 2d 723, 1992 WL 212025 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

603 So. 2d 723 (Rome v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaines v. State
605 So. 2d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Toombs v. State
605 So. 2d 952 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Ammons v. State
606 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Barfield v. State
605 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)