Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ammons v. State

Ammons v. State

606 So. 2d 1210, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10385, 1992 WL 240597
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 30, 1992
DocketNo. 92-980
StatusPublished

This text of 606 So. 2d 1210 (Ammons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ammons v. State, 606 So. 2d 1210, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10385, 1992 WL 240597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ralph B. Ammons has appealed an habitual offender sentence imposed after he pled nolo contendere in several cases. The habitual offender statute requires that certain findings be made before the enhanced penalties afforded by that statute may be applied. Section 775.084(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla.1985); Knickerbocker v. State, 604 So.2d 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Rome v. State, 603 So.2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Because the trial court herein failed to make the required findings, Ammons’ sentence is reversed, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

JOANOS, C.J., and ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. State
462 So. 2d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Knickerbocker v. State
604 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Rome v. State
603 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
606 So. 2d 1210, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10385, 1992 WL 240597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ammons-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.