Romano v. Housing Authority of Newark
12 A.2d 384, 124 N.J.L. 452, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 291
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Romano v. Housing Authority of Newark, 12 A.2d 384, 124 N.J.L. 452, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 291 (N.J. 1940).
12 A.2d 384 (Romano v. Housing Authority of Newark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roe v. Kervick
199 A.2d 834 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1964)
Lavin v. City of Camden
176 A.2d 304 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Passaic Jr. Chamber, Com., Inc. v. Passaic Hous. Auth.
132 A.2d 813 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Behnke v. New Jersey Highway Authority
97 A.2d 647 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Behnke v. NJ Highway Authority
95 A.2d 606 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Bergen Co. Sewer Authority v. Bor. of Little Ferry
72 A.2d 886 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Municipio de San Lorenzo v. La Junta de Planificación, Urbanización y Zonificación
68 P.R. Dec. 646 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1948)
Keyes v. United States
119 F.2d 444 (D.C. Circuit, 1941)