Roman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roman v. State

433 So. 2d 57, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20276

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 21, 1983

DocketNo. 82-2047

StatusPublished

This text of 433 So. 2d 57 (Roman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roman v. State, 433 So. 2d 57, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20276 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court is directed to conform its written judgment of conviction to the plea proceedings and oral adjudication so as to reflect that the defendant pled nolo conten-dere rather than guilty to the charges and that, as to Count 1, entered a plea to and was convicted of unlawful possession of cannabis in violation of Section 893.13(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1981), a first-degree misdemeanor, rather than a third-degree felony. As modified, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The trial court is directed to conform its written order granting probation to its oral adjudication so as to reflect that on the charge of unlawful possession of cannabis, the defendant was placed on one year concurrent probation with a special condition of six months imprisonment in the Dade County Jail. As modified, the order granting probation is affirmed.

Affirmed with directions to modify.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court is directed to conform its written judgment of conviction to the plea proceedings and oral adjudication so as to reflect that the defendant pled nolo conten-dere rather than guilty to the charges and that, as to Count 1, entered a plea to and was convicted of unlawful possession of cannabis in violation of Section 893.13(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1981), a first-degree misdemeanor, rather than a third-degree felony. As modified, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The trial court is directed to conform its written order granting probation to its oral adjudication so as to reflect that on the charge of unlawful possession of cannabis, the defendant was placed on one year concurrent probation with a special condition of six months imprisonment in the Dade County Jail. As modified, the order granting probation is affirmed.

Affirmed with directions to modify.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

433 So. 2d 57, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roman-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.