Roman v. Lobe

New York Court of Appeals

Roman v. Lobe

150 N.E. 535, 241 N.Y. 514, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 586

DecidedOctober 20, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.E. 535 (Roman v. Lobe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roman v. Lobe, 150 N.E. 535, 241 N.Y. 514, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 586 (N.Y. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question of the constitutionality of section 442-e of the Real Property Law is not before us on this appeal.

The decision of the trial court does not show upon its face that the plaintiff was denied a recovery because of his omission to procure a license. It is a decision for the defendant upon the merits generally. The Constitution commands us to presume that this decision, having been unanimously affirmed by thé Appellate Division, is supported by the evidence (Constitution, art. VI, § 9).

. The judgment should be affirmed with costs.

His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI