Rollins v. . Rogers

168 S.E. 206, 204 N.C. 308, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 391
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 8, 1933·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Stacy, O. J.

Mandamus is available against a board of county commissioners only to compel tbe board to do something which it is its duty to do without it. The writ confers no new authority. The party seeking it must have a clear legal right to demand it, and the board must be under a legal obligation to perform the act sought to be enforced. Neither of these prerequisites has been shown in the instant case. Powers v. Asheville, 203 N. C., 2, 164 S. E., 324; Person v. Doughton, 186 N. C., 723, 120 S. E., 481. The writ was improvidently granted.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rollins v. . Rogers, 168 S.E. 206, 204 N.C. 308, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 391 (N.C. 1933).

168 S.E. 206 (Rollins v. . Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Education v. Board of County Commissioners
81 S.E.2d 256 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of Wilmington
70 S.E.2d 833 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
White v. . Comrs. of Johnston
7 S.E.2d 825 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Harris v. . Board of Education
4 S.E.2d 328 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Mears v. . Board of Education
197 S.E. 752 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
John v. . Allen
177 S.E. 634 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)