Rolle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rolle v. State

668 So. 2d 1080, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1928, 1996 WL 86775

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 1996

DocketNo. 94-03076

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 668 So. 2d 1080 (Rolle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rolle v. State, 668 So. 2d 1080, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1928, 1996 WL 86775 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth C. Rolle appeals his convictions and sentences for robbery and solicitation to purchase cocaine. We affirm the convictions without discussion, but reverse for resentenc-ing.

Rolle received consecutive habitual offender sentences for the two convictions. However, the crimes he committed arose out of the same criminal episode. Consecutive habitual offender sentences cannot be imposed for multiple crimes occurring during a single episode. See State v. Hill, 660 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1995); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions that Rolle’s en[1081]*1081hanced sentences be ordered to run concurrently. The defendant need not be present.

RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI