Rolle v. State

711 So. 2d 1388, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7895, 1998 WL 347558
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 1998·No. No. 97-1185·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bruton v. State, 220 So.2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) (positive identification by one witness sufficient to support a conviction); Yant v. State, 192 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Vitiello v. State, 169 So.2d 339 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rolle v. State, 711 So. 2d 1388, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7895, 1998 WL 347558 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

711 So. 2d 1388 (Rolle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rolle v. State
904 So. 2d 492 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)