Rolle v. State

711 So. 2d 1388, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7895, 1998 WL 347558
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 1998
DocketNo. 97-1185
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 So. 2d 1388 (Rolle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rolle v. State, 711 So. 2d 1388, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7895, 1998 WL 347558 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bruton v. State, 220 So.2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) (positive identification by one witness sufficient to support a conviction); Yant v. State, 192 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Vitiello v. State, 169 So.2d 339 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rolle v. State
904 So. 2d 492 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 So. 2d 1388, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7895, 1998 WL 347558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolle-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.