Roll v. City Council

34 Ga. 326
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, C. J.

Whatever doubts may have been entertained, formerly, as to the claim against the City Council of Augusta, here set up by Mr. Eoll, the authorities, both in England and in this country, are too strong to be controverted. If the Legislature think proper to award damages, under such circumstances, let them say so ; otherwise, the parties who suffer are without remedy, — the Legislature considering that the [328] interests of individuals must give way to the accommodation of the public.

This case is so fully covered by the Mayor and Council of Rome vs. Omberg, 28 Ga. Reports, and the precedents there referred to, that we deem it altogether useless to enlarge upon this subject.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roll v. City Council, 34 Ga. 326 (Ga. 1866).

34 Ga. 326 (Roll v. City Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Atlanta v. Kenny
64 S.E.2d 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Brown v. City of Atlanta
145 S.E. 855 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Adams v. Oklahoma City
1908 OK 39 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Hurt v. City of Atlanta
28 S.E. 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Parke v. City of Seattle
31 P. 310 (Washington Supreme Court, 1892)
City of Atlanta v. Word
78 Ga. 276 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)
Reardon v. City of San Francisco
6 P. 317 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
City of Atlanta v. Green
67 Ga. 386 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)
Gillison v. City of Charleston
16 W. Va. 282 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1880)
Eaton v. B. C. & M. R. R.
51 N.H. 504 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1872)