Roland v. Railway Express Agency

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Roland v. Railway Express Agency

161 S.E. 483, 201 N.C. 815, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 109

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 16, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 483 (Roland v. Railway Express Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roland v. Railway Express Agency, 161 S.E. 483, 201 N.C. 815, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 109 (N.C. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

In the absence of any evidence tending to show that their agent was authorized by defendants to procure the warrant on which plaintiff was arrested and prosecuted, or that defendants ratified the action of their agent in procuring the warrant and prosecuting the plaintiff, this action was properly dismissed. Lamm v. Charles Stores Co., ante, 134, 159 S. E., 444. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee CueiaM.

In the absence of any evidence tending to show that their agent was authorized by defendants to procure the warrant on which plaintiff was arrested and prosecuted, or that defendants ratified the action of their agent in procuring the warrant and prosecuting the plaintiff, this action was properly dismissed. Lamm v. Charles Stores Co., ante, 134, 159 S. E., 444. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.E. 483, 201 N.C. 815, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-v-railway-express-agency-nc-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack