Rojas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rojas v. State

523 So. 2d 1179, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 691, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1988 WL 21032

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 1988

DocketNo. 87-1329

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 523 So. 2d 1179 (Rojas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rojas v. State, 523 So. 2d 1179, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 691, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1988 WL 21032 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding no merit in appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish his participation in a conspiracy, that the trial court erred in admitting audio tapes into evidence, and that error appeared in the admission of evidence of other crimes, we affirm his convictions of attempt to traffic in cannabis and conspiracy [1180]*1180to traffic in cannabis. See United States v. Martin, 794 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir.1986); Munroe v. State, 514 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), review denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988); State v. Morales, 460 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The state concedes that appellant’s attempted trafficking conviction, incorrectly cited as a first degree felony, should be corrected to appear as a second degree felony. We remand for that purpose.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding no merit in appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish his participation in a conspiracy, that the trial court erred in admitting audio tapes into evidence, and that error appeared in the admission of evidence of other crimes, we affirm his convictions of attempt to traffic in cannabis and conspiracy [1180]*1180to traffic in cannabis. See United States v. Martin, 794 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir.1986); Munroe v. State, 514 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), review denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988); State v. Morales, 460 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The state concedes that appellant’s attempted trafficking conviction, incorrectly cited as a first degree felony, should be corrected to appear as a second degree felony. We remand for that purpose.

Affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 So. 2d 1179, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 691, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1988 WL 21032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rojas-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack