Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 428

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 329 →

United States Customs Court·Decided December 22, 1958·No. Reap. Dec. 9279; Entry No. WH-38319·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 428 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

42 Cust. Ct. 428 (Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.