Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 565
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 10, 1957
DocketReap. Dec. 8725; Entry Nos. 792992; 825829; 862864
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 565 (Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 565 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, was exported from Japan.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of such merchandise to the United States the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets from the country in which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, was the net invoice price, packing included.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for consumption in the country of exportation.
[566]*566IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Re-appraisement set forth in Schedule A may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the net invoice price, packing included.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Cust. Ct. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohner-gehrig-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.