Rogers v. State

1916 OK CR 33, 155 P. 1150, 12 Okla. Crim. 324, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 41
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rogers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Okla. Crim. 235
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 6, 1916·No. No. A-2525.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff in error, Jim Rogers, was convicted on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and to be confined in the county jail for thirty days.

The evidence for the state tended to show that Jim Rogers sold a pint of alcohol to T. E. Moore.

As a witness in his own behalf plaintiff in error, Jim Rogers denied making the sale. The issue was clearly one of fact for the jury to determine. The record presents no question of law for the determination of this court. It follows that the convic tion should be affirmed. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State, 1916 OK CR 33, 155 P. 1150, 12 Okla. Crim. 324, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 41 (Okla. Ct. App. 1916).

1916 OK CR 33 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.