Rogers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rogers v. State

1916 OK CR 33, 155 P. 1150, 12 Okla. Crim. 324, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 41

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 6, 1916

DocketNo. A-2525.

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK CR 33 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. State, 1916 OK CR 33, 155 P. 1150, 12 Okla. Crim. 324, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 41 (Okla. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff in error, Jim Rogers, was convicted on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and to be confined in the county jail for thirty days.

The evidence for the state tended to show that Jim Rogers sold a pint of alcohol to T. E. Moore.

As a witness in his own behalf plaintiff in error, Jim Rogers denied making the sale. The issue was clearly one of fact for the jury to determine. The record presents no question of law for the determination of this court. It follows that the convic tion should be affirmed. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff in error, Jim Rogers, was convicted on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and to be confined in the county jail for thirty days.

The evidence for the state tended to show that Jim Rogers sold a pint of alcohol to T. E. Moore.

As a witness in his own behalf plaintiff in error, Jim Rogers denied making the sale. The issue was clearly one of fact for the jury to determine. The record presents no question of law for the determination of this court. It follows that the convic tion should be affirmed. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK CR 33, 155 P. 1150, 12 Okla. Crim. 324, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-oklacrimapp-1916.