Rogers v. State

730 So. 2d 716, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 665, 1999 WL 30673
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 1999·No. No. 98-0635·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for attempted first degree murder (Count I) and attempted second degree murder with a firearm (Count II). Although we find no merit in Rogers’ numerous challenges to his conviction, we agree with his assertion that the trial court imposed a departure sentence without written reasons.

Rogers was sentenced to twenty-five years for Count I and seventeen years for Count II, for a total of forty-two years. When a defendant is convicted of multiple offenses, a trial court should impose a separate sentence for each offense. The total sentence, however, cannot exceed the total guideline sentence unless a written reason is given for the departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(12). Rogers’ guideline sentencing range was seventeen to forty years; the State concedes that the forty-two year sentence which the trial court imposed amounted to a departure sentence without written reasons and was error. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing within the guidelines.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

STONE, C.J., DELL and STEVENSON, jj.} concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State, 730 So. 2d 716, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 665, 1999 WL 30673 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

730 So. 2d 716 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dailey v. State
791 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)