Rogers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rogers v. State

704 So. 2d 1147, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 903, 1998 WL 39548

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 1998

DocketNo. 97-0785

StatusPublished

This text of 704 So. 2d 1147 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. State, 704 So. 2d 1147, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 903, 1998 WL 39548 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, the judgment erroneously indicates that appellant pled nolo contendere to two counts of sale or delivery of cocaine near a school and two counts of possession of cocaine. We remand to correct the judgment to reflect that appellant was adjudicated guilty as a result of a jury verdict.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, the judgment erroneously indicates that appellant pled nolo contendere to two counts of sale or delivery of cocaine near a school and two counts of possession of cocaine. We remand to correct the judgment to reflect that appellant was adjudicated guilty as a result of a jury verdict.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 So. 2d 1147, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 903, 1998 WL 39548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.