Rogers v. Sontag

1988 OK 94, 764 P.2d 883, 1988 Okla. LEXIS 106, 1988 WL 88126
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedAugust 17, 1988
DocketNo. 71513
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1988 OK 94 (Rogers v. Sontag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Sontag, 1988 OK 94, 764 P.2d 883, 1988 Okla. LEXIS 106, 1988 WL 88126 (Okla. 1988).

Opinion

[884]*884ORDER

Original jurisdiction is assumed. Respondent Cody stipulated before the Election Board that he did not have a high school education or a G.E.D. equivalent at that time, and was not qualified at that time to hold office, although he hoped to have a G.E.D. by the time of the election. 19 O.S. 1981 § 510 addresses not only the requirements for eligibility to hold the office of sheriff, but also to file therefor. A plain reading of the statute indicates that a candidate for the Office of County Sheriff must possess a high school education to file for said office.

Respondents’ equal protection argument is also without merit. Classifications drawn by the Legislature are to be set aside only if they are based solely on reasons totally unrelated to the pursuit of state goals and if no grounds can be conceived to justify them. Fleming v. Baptist General Convention, 742 P.2d 1087, 1097 (Okl.1987). The Legislature may address itself to the phase of a problem which seems most acute to the legislative mind and such action does not violate the Equal Protection Clause. Williamson v. Lee Optical, 348 U.S. 483, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955).

The District Court’s Writ of Mandamus granted on August 4, 1988 is vacated. A Writ of Mandamus is granted hereby ordering the Nowata County Election Board to strike the name of William G. “Bill” Cody from the primary election ballot for the Office of Sheriff of Nowata County to be held on August 23, 1988.

HARGRAVE, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, OPALA, ALMA WILSON, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. DOOLIN, C.J., and HODGES and KAUGER, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivas v. Parkland Manor
2000 OK 68 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1988 OK 94, 764 P.2d 883, 1988 Okla. LEXIS 106, 1988 WL 88126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-sontag-okla-1988.