Rogers v. Rogers

103 S.E. 156, 150 Ga. 181, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 99
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1920
DocketNo. 1766
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 156 (Rogers v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Rogers, 103 S.E. 156, 150 Ga. 181, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 99 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

In a suit by a wife against her husband for divorce, alimony, and counsel fees, the judge at an interlocutory hearing rendered a judgment allowing the wife specified sums to be paid monthly as temporary alimony, and stated amount for attorney’s fees. The only exception to the judgment was: “To this judgment of the court the defendant excepted, now excepts, and assigns the same as error.” Held, that the assignment of error is not sufficiently specific to present any question for decision; and the writ of error is dismissed on motion. Knight v. Knight, 149 Ga. 513 (101 S. E. 181).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Lester
142 S.E. 870 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Edwards v. Finley
103 S.E. 156 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 156, 150 Ga. 181, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-rogers-ga-1920.