Rogers v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rogers v. Rogers

103 S.E. 156, 150 Ga. 181, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 99

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1920·No. No. 1766·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

In a suit by a wife against her husband for divorce, alimony, and counsel fees, the judge at an interlocutory hearing rendered a judgment allowing the wife specified sums to be paid monthly as temporary alimony, and stated amount for attorney’s fees. The only exception to the judgment was: “To this judgment of the court the defendant excepted, now excepts, and assigns the same as error.” Held, that the assignment of error is not sufficiently specific to present any question for decision; and the writ of error is dismissed on motion. Knight v. Knight, 149 Ga. 513 (101 S. E. 181).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

In a suit by a wife against her husband for divorce, alimony, and counsel fees, the judge at an interlocutory hearing rendered a judgment allowing the wife specified sums to be paid monthly as temporary alimony, and stated amount for attorney’s fees. The only exception to the judgment was: “To this judgment of the court the defendant excepted, now excepts, and assigns the same as error.” Held, that the assignment of error is not sufficiently specific to present any question for decision; and the writ of error is dismissed on motion. Knight v. Knight, 149 Ga. 513 (101 S. E. 181).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Rogers v. Rogers, 103 S.E. 156, 150 Ga. 181, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 99 (Ga. 1920).

Pincite

103 S.E. 156 (Rogers v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related