Knight v. Knight

101 S.E. 181, 149 Ga. 513, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 302
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 15, 1919
DocketNo. 1348
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 101 S.E. 181 (Knight v. Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight v. Knight, 101 S.E. 181, 149 Ga. 513, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 302 (Ga. 1919).

Opinion

Hill, J.

Where, in an application for temporary alimony and counsel fees, the court awarded a certain amount as temporary alimony and counsel fees, and the plaintiff in error in the bill of exceptions, after reciting that the judgment of the court was as above set out, his sole exception being in this language: “And to this order and judgment of the court this plaintiff in error then excepted, and now excepts to the same and now assigns the same as error,” such exception does not comply with the requirement that alleged errors shall be plainly and distinctly pointed out. Consequently, under the ruling in Holland v. Holland, 147 Ga. 32 (92 S. E. 538), and cases there cited, the'writ of error must be dismissed.

[514]*514No. 1348. November 15, 1919. Writ of error; from Tattnall. Motion to dismiss. H. H. Elders, for plaintiff in error. C. L. Cowart, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. Finley
103 S.E. 156 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Rogers v. Rogers
103 S.E. 156 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.E. 181, 149 Ga. 513, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-knight-ga-1919.